A construction's initial phase is based on the detailed designs done by the architects. Investing in time to plan the architectural design of the structure, the architects gradually progress to developing with efficiency. But the time given to plan the architectural designs of the structure is backed up by programs, project schedules, limited vulnerability, budgeting and cost control.
As a part of their architectural services, the architects fulfil the clients' needs of the building structure while planning the designs by taking the timescale and expenses into account. Thinking about the construction procedure is fundamental, so creating a plan facilitating the construction is feasible. This very construction-led designs approach is prioritized to achieve better outcomes.
In this discussion, we have pointed out the different steps involved in the design process for facilitating construction.
1. Tending to the Design Complexity
Planning the designs is the most complex procedure in architectural services, but the architects keep on simplifying the complicated steps using their skills and knowledge. At this stage, they involve all the information they have collected from the client. They ensure collecting accurate information to put into the structural designs.
By using the software for steel structure and framing, the architects can easily calculate the forces and moments. The architectural designs should be emitting a qualitative feel to remain in balance with the frames growing in complexity.
2. Collaboration with the Designing Team
As responsible professional architects, they have to retain a long-haul relationship with the clients, contractors and their own team. Collaboration is integral to architectural services and has an influential role in the architectural strategies decided among the coordinators.
With the agreement kind being established between the investor and the architects, the construction grows into an alternate structure contingent. Herein, the three basic agreement kinds exist, which include –
i. Traditional Approach
The investor takes hires Engineers for working on the designs and a contractor for getting the construction done.
ii. Design-Build Approach
The investor hires a single architectural firm for doing the design and construction works. Here, a chief benefit is the hired contractors or subcontractors are rather almost certain of being included from the beginning phase. Therefore, their construction experiences are likely to be included in the design plan.
iii. Construction Management Approach
The investor first hires the project manager (that is, the architect), and the project manager further hires other team members on the owner’s behalf, thus acting as the client representative.
3. Guarantying Agreement of Information
Compiling and concurring a program, the architects ensure fixing the dates by which the data is needed. The lead zone architect guarantees each aspect of the construction project has been accurately and completely defined. For guarantying the involved teams are working using the updated data, the architects have set up a framework or system for screening the drawings cautiously and updating the amendments to the schedule.
As appointed, the architect in charge of the project manager as well as the client representative plays an active role to make decisions at the key points. By liaising with the design team for assembling each and every necessary information, the architect agrees to or makes certain amendments as needed and then signs the contract.
Say, for example, a contractor is likely to come across a few issues on site, but the architect and engineers should be ready with a solution. It is possible when the architect retains a clear and concrete understanding between the parties and ensures integrated information supply as per the construction needs.
The effect of the modern working practices has lessened the timescales influencing the information transfer or supply to the concerned involved teams. Nevertheless, the use of cloud designing software has increased, thus, the information transformation has been eased out and has become much quicker.
4. Keeping Up With Coordination
Sometimes, two or three architects of an architectural firm are involved in the initial designing phase. Information is gathered from the investors and project managers with their own objectives. The MEP and structural engineers and architects could be concerned about the project's small parts, and sometimes coordination problems could arise. But with the construction-led approach, the architects arrange for a formal meeting at the key stages for agreeing upon the decided programs and details.
5. Deciding on Interfaces
The physical interfaces are basically the building features, and these are likely to show up in between the zones, systems and components. The architects make the separation a clear system crossing the zones. The lead architects negotiate with the involved team members for establishing the line of interface, the policy on intolerance, and so on and so forth.
6. Developing the Structure Design
As the architects collect huge information, so they ensure carefully control them. Allowances for design developments are built-in to the design program for coping with the problems often arising in practice. There might be time periods when a two-way information exchange between the designing and construction teams becomes possible, nevertheless, the ever-decreasing timescales are lessening these overlap possibilities.
Before starting to design, the architects consider the issues related to planning, management and designing. Designing for the structure construction helps the architects to be clear about the vital aspects of the site before the project commences.
Comments
Post a Comment